Skip to content

Creation Ministry provides the science and Scripture of the Genesis creation and global flood

  • Home
  • The Book
    • Preface
    • Gravity
    • The Effects of Weaker Gravity on Life
    • The Canopy of Salt Water
    • Climate
    • Oxygen Concentration
    • Land Was More Plentiful in the Past
    • Meteors, Asteroids, and Comets
    • Earth’s Spin at Origins
    • The Flood
    • No Deserts before the Flood
    • Seven-Day Creation Versus Seven-Eon Creation
  • Study Guides
  • Recordings
    • What Happened to the Dinosaurs?
    • How Does Carbon 14 Dating Work?
    • Was there a Global Flood?
    • How old is the earth?
    • Transitional fossils, Truth or Fiction?
    • Were the Days of Creation literal or figurative?
    • Were the Days of Creation 24 hours?
    • How Did God Create Matter?
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence Appeared on Daniel Ott’s, The Edge
    • Dr. Walter Brown interviewed by Larry Wessels
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence interviewed by George Noory on Coast to Coast
    • Kent Hovind vs Michael Shermer
  • About
    • CreationMinistry.org
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence’s Biography
    • From Dr. Lawrence’s Desk
    • Statement of Faith
  • Creation Vs Evolution
    • Evolution Creation
      • Movie Review: First Man
      • Natural Selection
      • Were The Days Of Creation 24 Hours Long?
      • Does Isaiah 40:22 Say The Earth Is A Ball?
      • Was Genesis 7 A Global Flood Or A Local Flood?
      • How Dangerous is Evolution to Salvation?
      • The Lie of Evolution with the Sclera
      • What is the Age of a Spiral Galaxy?
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • Circular Reasoning of Deep Time
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Circular Reasoning
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • Genetically identical twins – but not so identical traits
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Seven things Darwin didn’t tell you
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The existing species concept called into question
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • Trust in GOD
      • The spin of the Earth is slowing
      • Evolution Debunked
  • Contact

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages. wpbeginner'/>
http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/interbedding-grand-canyon.jpg
http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/foldedlayers.jpg
http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/14494791.jpg.crop_display.jpg
http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/tennpoly-viss.jpg</div>
		</aside>			</div><!-- .widget-area -->
		
	</div><!-- .secondary -->

	</div><!-- .sidebar -->

	<div id=

How to Find the most reliable online Casino Reviews

The Best Online Casino Reviews: To find out more about online casinos ratings and reviews, adhere to these essential criteria. It covers all of the essential aspects that every review has to cover. It should firstly include the essential aspects that every review of an online casino must include. Safety and security are a major factor in every online casino that enables players to play online casino games with real cash. Any casino that is reputable will provide a high level of safety and security while playing.

Also, be wary of whether the customer support is reliable. If you have concerns or questions regarding a transaction, you should be able to reach the most reputable online casino reviews for a solution. Any trustworthy online casino will provide excellent customer service. You shouldn’t need to wait for a call or be reached via email. If the site doesn’t provide exceptional customer service, leave them and find another site.

A lot of us want to check into the casino’s banking options for deposits and withdrawals. We need to be able withdraw money from our bank accounts from any of the top online casino reviews sites. We would like to be able to withdraw and deposit funds to our accounts. Online casinos that provide great customer service will provide the full range of banking options for withdrawal and deposit.

Other issues we players should consider are the deposits methods, if the casino offers various deposit methods, as well as the type of payment options available. Online casino reviews also look Shock at bonus programs as well as other ways to boost your bankroll at the casino. The types of bonuses offered by the site are another aspect to examine. The most favorable online casino reviews are positive if the bonuses offered by the website are appealing.

It is crucial to look at the types of software and gaming systems that casinos offer online. Some casinos offer progressive slot machines, poker networks, roulette systems and many more. We must know what type of gaming system the site offers, and how they are integrated with the website. A good customer service customer service is an important issue that we should look into when reading the top reviews of online casinos.

There are also a few issues that involve the payment-processing capabilities of the site. You might want to search for sites that allow you to pay your winnings using a credit card or PayPal account. These options allow players to make sure that their winnings are not lost and also to withdraw them fast and to receive their winnings faster than if they had a credit card. Websites that prohibit AdmiralBet Casino players from transferring funds to their accounts or require them to open a separate account are not trusted.

The level of customer care provided by the online gambling websites we choose to gamble on is an important factor in our gambling decision-making process. Online casino reviews will discuss all the important things we need to consider when evaluating a site. Before choosing a casino to play on it is important to look at the types of promotions offered by the website and the software that supports it. The financial standing of the site and the reliability of the payment processing methods, that it provides players are things to be looking into. It is also possible to be aware of the games that the site offers and the range of games available, the payout percentages and rates, and the games’ customer service reputation.

Let’s take a look at the deposit options available at each online gambling site. All casinos allow players to make deposits using any credit card that is accepted by major banks. Some allow players who have money providers such as MasterCard or Visa to make deposits. Each of the sites we evaluate should provide a variety of payment options, including direct deposit and through third-party payment processors such as PayPal. We should also take a look at the deposit bonuses offered by each site and what we can expect to receive in the return of our deposit. We should also check into the security measures each website employs to ensure that the privacy of our personal data and our money are safe and secure.

Posted on May 15, 2026Author AdminCategories Evolution Creation

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Pinco platforması – Zəiflik və güc arasında balans tapmaq
Next Next post: Top Neteller Casino Sites: The Ultimate Overview to Protect and Convenient Online Gambling
Proudly powered by WordPress