Skip to content

Creation Ministry provides the science and Scripture of the Genesis creation and global flood

  • Home
  • The Book
    • Preface
    • Gravity
    • The Effects of Weaker Gravity on Life
    • The Canopy of Salt Water
    • Climate
    • Oxygen Concentration
    • Land Was More Plentiful in the Past
    • Meteors, Asteroids, and Comets
    • Earth’s Spin at Origins
    • The Flood
    • No Deserts before the Flood
    • Seven-Day Creation Versus Seven-Eon Creation
  • Study Guides
  • Recordings
    • What Happened to the Dinosaurs?
    • How Does Carbon 14 Dating Work?
    • Was there a Global Flood?
    • How old is the earth?
    • Transitional fossils, Truth or Fiction?
    • Were the Days of Creation literal or figurative?
    • Were the Days of Creation 24 hours?
    • How Did God Create Matter?
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence Appeared on Daniel Ott’s, The Edge
    • Dr. Walter Brown interviewed by Larry Wessels
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence interviewed by George Noory on Coast to Coast
    • Kent Hovind vs Michael Shermer
  • About
    • CreationMinistry.org
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence’s Biography
    • From Dr. Lawrence’s Desk
    • Statement of Faith
  • Creation Vs Evolution
    • Evolution Creation
      • Movie Review: First Man
      • Natural Selection
      • Were The Days Of Creation 24 Hours Long?
      • Does Isaiah 40:22 Say The Earth Is A Ball?
      • Was Genesis 7 A Global Flood Or A Local Flood?
      • How Dangerous is Evolution to Salvation?
      • The Lie of Evolution with the Sclera
      • What is the Age of a Spiral Galaxy?
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • Circular Reasoning of Deep Time
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Circular Reasoning
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • Genetically identical twins – but not so identical traits
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Seven things Darwin didn’t tell you
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The existing species concept called into question
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • Trust in GOD
      • The spin of the Earth is slowing
      • Evolution Debunked
  • Contact

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages. wpbeginner'/> http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/interbedding-grand-canyon.jpg http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/foldedlayers.jpg http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/14494791.jpg.crop_display.jpg http://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/tennpoly-viss.jpg</div> </aside> </div><!-- .widget-area --> </div><!-- .secondary --> </div><!-- .sidebar --> <div id=

Михаил Зборовский (екс Космобет): Прогнозирование потребительского поведения с помощью Big Data

Михаил Зборовский Космобет (екс бенефициар) и эксперт по стратегическому развитию iGaming продуктов поделиться с нами своим опытом. Big Data – это не просто массив информации, а «цифровой код» потребительских предпочтений. Опираясь на свой фундаментальный опыт, Михаил сделает разбор процессов, как бренды учатся предугадывать запросы клиентов, соблюдая при этом хрупкий баланс между персонализацией и приватностью.

Как данные меняют сервис

Традиционный маркетинг всегда был реактивным: пользователь совершал действие, и бренд на него реагировал. Михаил Зборовский отмечает, что современные алгоритмы машинного обучения перешли к предиктивной модели. Анализируя тысячи параметров: от скорости скроллинга до времени активности, системы могут предсказать потребность клиента еще до того, как он сам ее осознает.

Что именно анализирует Big Data сегодня?

  • Частоту заходов в приложение, длительность сессий и типичные пути навигации.
  • Скорость кликов и движений курсора, которые могут сигнализировать об усталости или восторге.
  • Корреляция активности пользователя с событиями в мире, погодой или локальными праздниками.

Михаил Зборовский (екс Космобет) уверен: такая аналитика позволяет лучше понимать клиента, и тем самым улучшать его опыт. 

Кейсы персонализации

Персонализация в 2026 году – это не обращение по имени в письме. Это создание индивидуальной цифровой среды для каждого. Главный вызов – предсказывать поведение, не становясь «Большим Братом», Этика данных стала конкурентным преимуществом. Бренды, которые злоупотребляют слежкой, теряют аудиторию навсегда. Михаил Зборовский (екс Космобет) выделяет несколько ключевых сценариев, где Big Data радикально улучшает пользовательский опыт:

  • Рекомендация только тех продуктов или игр, которые соответствуют психотипу игрока.
  • Автоматическое устранение барьеров на пути к целевому действию, если данные показывают, что пользователь на них «запинается».

Персонализация увеличивает LTV (ценность клиента) в разы. Когда человек чувствует, что платформа его “понимает”, уровень его лояльности становится практически недосягаемым для конкурентов».

Протоколы приватности:

  • Использование синтетических данных для обучения нейросетей, где личная информация заменена математическими абстракциями.
  • Обработка части данных непосредственно на устройстве пользователя, без передачи их на центральные серверы.
  • Пользователь должен четко знать, какие данные собираются и как они помогают улучшить его опыт.

Подводя итог, Михаил Зборовский подчеркивает: Big Data в 2026 году – это инструмент гуманизации технологий. Сухие цифры делают цифровой мир более человечным, предсказуемым и комфортным. Компании, которые смогут объединить мощь аналитики с глубоким уважением к частной жизни, зададут стандарты на десятилетия вперед.

Posted on April 6, 2024April 5, 2026Author AdminCategories Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Directorio de Sports Bars en Aguirreño Ver deportes en vivo cerca de ti
Next Next post: Бонусы Вавада для повышения шансов на выигрыш
Proudly powered by WordPress