Monthly Support

Your monthly support is appreciated. All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.

Amount options

One Time Donation

All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.

Bulk Purchase Discounts

Bulk purchases discounts are available. Please contact us to inquire. Purchase the book

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages.

The spin of the Earth is slowing

The spin of the Earth is slowing, and for this reason, I have been urging Creationists for many years to stop saying that the duration of each day of creation was 24 hours. The reason is multi-faceted, but primarily it deals with the lunar gravitational pull causing our twice daily ocean tides, which takes angular momentum out of the spin of the earth, and the moon uses this energy taken out of the spin to recede further away from the earth. The spin of the Earth is slowing because of the moon’s gravity and its effect on the ocean tides.

And for this reason, the spin of the earth is gradually slowing and ever progressing toward a slower spin. This should tell those who adhere to a 24 hour day for creation that since the duration of the day is 24 hours today, then it could not have been 24 hours at creation because we are ever trending toward a slower spin.

For some reason those who adhere to 24 hours, they think that not sticking with 24 hours at creation somehow undermines the Bible. No, quite to the contrary. By not sticking with 24 hours strengthens the creation argument for literal rotations of the earth in the Genesis creation account. How?

For one, when someone knows the physics of cosmological celestial resonance, they will know that the lunar gravitational pull is slowing the earth, and they will connect the dots that, A) the earth’s day duration today is 24 hours, and B) the earth is ever slowing its spin because of the moon, which is moving further away from the earth, then C) the duration of a day 6,000 years ago could not have been 24 hours, and therefore, creationists are wrong by saying 24 hours. And this may lead to many to reject creation based on this conclusion.

Secondly, Creationists who adhere to 24 hours, there is no scripture that ever says 24 hours. My contention is that this is because the Holy Spirit knows that the duration of the day is not a constant. That the duration of the day is ever trending toward getting longer because the earth is slowing.

Thirdly, Creationists do not realize that the science suggests that the duration of the day for creation and Adam and Eve was closer to 17 hours than 24 hours. This means that this information actually points toward a more literal creation account because the science is proving that the days of creation could not have been long epics of time. That the duration of the day progressively gets shorter the closer to creation.

Now there is are important factors in this equation, and that is the inverse square law and exponential calculations. For the further back in time we go, the moon’s rate of recession from the earth increases. The rate of lunar recession is not a linear constant rate, no, it is an exponential rate of recession the further back in time we go. The reason for this is because of the inverse square law. This law means that the further the moon is from the earth, the less its gravitational force affects earth’s matter, Specifically the ocean tides. And how this works is that the further back in time we go, the closer the moon is to the earth, which results in greater ocean tides. And it is the ocean tides that is taking angular momentum (spin velocity) out of the earth. This is the mechanism that proves the duration of the day for each day of creation could not have been 24 hours. The oceans tides today are smaller that millennia ago.

What does a slowing of the earth’s spin result in? Smaller circumference, which leads to more earthquakes and more internal pressure, which leads to an increase in mantle temperatures, which leads to more magma, volcanoes, earthquakes, global warming, melting polar ice, warmer seas, more tornadoes, more hurricanes, so that the seas roar with greater intensity of hurricanes. This is just the beginning. Those who say mankind is the primary or only culprit to global warming is a science denier and merely trying to keep people away from the Word of God because the Bible predicted these things would occur together near the return of the Messiah.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/world-turns-more-slowly-face-051509504.html