Monthly Support

Your monthly support is appreciated. All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.

Amount options

One Time Donation

All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.

Bulk Purchase Discounts

Bulk purchases discounts are available. Please contact us to inquire. Purchase the book

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages.

Land Was More Plentiful in the Past

Chapter 6

Land Was More Plentiful in the Past

Is it true that land was more plentiful in the past? The premise of this book is that the earth’s net gravity was approximately 13.5% to 21.5% weaker in some past millennium and oxygen concentrations in the atmosphere were 50% higher than today’s current values. And those two changes caused life forms to be enormous in size and to live a long time. What did earth look like when gravity was weaker and oxygen levels were higher?

In order for the above premise to occur, with 13.5% to 21.5% weaker gravity and 50% higher oxygen concentrations, there needs to be more land and less ocean water covering that land. The more land that is accessible for vegetation growth, the more oxygen is produced by vegetation. The ocean water needs to be stored in a place that somehow reduces gravity and blocks the sun’s harmful rays. Therefore, this book’s premise needs fewer oceans in order to expose more land. The oceans limit the amount of vegetation that can grow and thereby directly reduce the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere. Also, there can’t be any deserts or polar ice caps because both of them limit vegetation growth as well and thereby directly limit the oxygen concentration.

[expander_maker more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

For dinosaurs to live long and grow to enormous sizes, gravity needs to be around 21.5% weaker than today’s current value. This means that either the earth’s mass needs to be less in order to support weaker gravity, or Earth needs to have spun much faster, or buoyant force needs to be much larger, or some combination of that. For dinosaurs and humans to live such long lives, almost 1,000 years, oxygen concentrations needs to be around 50% higher than today’s current value, which means more land needs to be exposed to grow more vegetation and produce more oxygen.

The solution that solves the above problem and fulfills both requirements of this book’s premise of weaker gravity and higher oxygen, is removing most of the earth’s oceans and placing some of that water around the atmosphere and some in deep caverns under the crust (surface) of the earth, leaving maybe one-fourth remaining as seas.

Review: Removing the ocean waters and placing that water in two locations—outside and around our atmosphere and in deep caverns under the crust of the earth—would weaken the earth’s gravity because of the buoyant force and increase the earth’s oxygen concentration by increasing the exposed land for vegetation growth.

In addition, a solution that aids the premise. . .

To get the rest of the chapter, Get Your Book Today!

[/expander_maker]