Skip to content

Creation Ministry provides the science and Scripture of the Genesis creation and global flood

  • Home
  • The Book
    • Preface
    • Gravity
    • The Effects of Weaker Gravity on Life
    • The Canopy of Salt Water
    • Climate
    • Oxygen Concentration
    • Land Was More Plentiful in the Past
    • Meteors, Asteroids, and Comets
    • Earth’s Spin at Origins
    • The Flood
    • No Deserts before the Flood
    • Seven-Day Creation Versus Seven-Eon Creation
  • Study Guides
    • Study Guide-Section 1 of 3
    • Study Guide-Section 2 of 3
    • Study Guide-Section 3 of 3
  • Recordings
    • What Happened to the Dinosaurs?
    • How Does Carbon 14 Dating Work?
    • Was there a Global Flood?
    • How old is the earth?
    • Transitional fossils, Truth or Fiction?
    • Were the Days of Creation literal or figurative?
    • Were the Days of Creation 24 hours?
    • How Did God Create Matter?
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence Appeared on Daniel Ott’s, The Edge
    • Dr. Walter Brown interviewed by Larry Wessels
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence interviewed by George Noory on Coast to Coast
    • Kent Hovind vs Michael Shermer
  • About
    • CreationMinistry.org
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence’s Biography
    • From Dr. Lawrence’s Desk
    • Statement of Faith
  • Creation Vs Evolution
    • Evolution Creation
      • Movie Review: First Man
      • Natural Selection
      • Were The Days Of Creation 24 Hours Long?
      • Does Isaiah 40:22 Say The Earth Is A Ball?
      • Was Genesis 7 A Global Flood Or A Local Flood?
      • How Dangerous is Evolution to Salvation?
      • The Lie of Evolution with the Sclera
      • What is the Age of a Spiral Galaxy?
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • Circular Reasoning of Deep Time
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Circular Reasoning
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • Genetically identical twins – but not so identical traits
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Seven things Darwin didn’t tell you
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The existing species concept called into question
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • Trust in GOD
      • The spin of the Earth is slowing
      • Evolution Debunked
  • Contact

Monthly Support

Your monthly support is appreciated. All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.
Amount options

One Time Donation

Donate to Creation Ministry
All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.




Bulk Purchase Discounts

Bulk Purchase Discount Bulk purchases discounts are available. Please contact us to inquire. Purchase the book

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages. wpbeginner'/>
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/interbedding-grand-canyon.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/foldedlayers.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/14494791.jpg.crop_display.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/tennpoly-viss.jpg</div>
		</aside>			</div><!-- .widget-area -->
		
	</div><!-- .secondary -->

	</div><!-- .sidebar -->

	<div id=

Climate

Chapter 4
Climate

What would a canopy of salt water do to our temperatures and climate? This would create a greenhouse effect scenario, not a greenhouse effect in the negative sense, as in too much CO2, but in a positive sense, as in stable temperate global temperatures with high O2 concentrations. Temperate temperatures on the surface of the earth would mean no polar ice caps, no deserts, and abundant lush green tropical vegetation uniformly growing around the globe.

Before the Flood of Gen. 7, there would have been massive amounts of water stored above the atmosphere in the canopy and stored below the crust of the earth in deep caverns (the source of the 40 days and nights of rain); oceans wouldn’t exist, only smaller seas. Let’s journey through these claims, and see if there is support for this pre-Flood utopia.

Does the Bible support temperate temperatures before the Flood? Yes. Gen. 3:7: “Then the eyes of both of them (Adam and Eve) were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loin coverings.” That is correct—Adam and Eve lived in such a temperate climate that they were naked every day and night of the year until they sinned and covered their loins (private parts). Notice that they didn’t put on jackets for winter or clothes after they sinned. They merely covered their reproductive organs. Therefore, the climate didn’t change. Their eyes were spiritually open to the knowledge of good and evil. Also, after and during God’s creation, He kept saying, “It was good.” Deserts and polar ice caps are bad for the growth of vegetation and for living beings to thrive. Also, the change of seasons from cool springs to hot summers would have brought destructive and harmful tornadoes, which didn’t occur before the Flood because of the relatively constant temperate global temperatures. Additionally, the change of season from hot summer months to cooler fall months would have spawned many hurricanes, which didn’t occur before the Flood because of the relatively constant temperate global temperatures. One cannot argue that tornadoes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters occurred on the globe before the fall of Adam and Eve because those conditions result in death and destruction. This is clarified in Romans 5:12, that death did not enter creation until Adam sinned.[expander_maker more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Do evolutionary scientists support the notion that at some point, there were temperate global temperatures? Yes, allegedly during the Cambrian explosion of life, oxygen levels were high enough and temperatures stable enough for life to thrive and eventually lead to dinosaurs and a great variety and complexity of creatures; there was a brief (in geological terms) period of optimal temperatures that allowed life to thrive. Optimal conditions for life is a foundation for evolution. Though we differ on when, what, and how of the origins of life, evolutionists believe that at the spawning of the first life, a single-cell organism occurred because conditions were optimal for life to begin. The optimal conditions concept is another common ground between the two hypotheses. Evolutionists believe there were periods of optimal conditions for life, and creationists believe that there were optimal conditions as well before the Flood. For this chapter, that optimal condition included modest temperatures and climate before the Flood.

Think about the benefits for living beings; there would be no wasted energy to warm a cold body, no shivers and goose bumps, and no need to cool an overheated body with perspiration.

Review: From the origins of life till the Flood, there were mild, temperate global temperatures, and this helped life to thrive.

Does the Bible support the scenario of no polar ice caps and no deserts before the Flood? Yes. The existence of polar ice caps and deserts creates global changes in temperature from one region to another on the earth. These differences in temperature from different regions on the earth cause a global wind called the jet stream. When did the wind first occur? Immediately after the Flood of Gen. 8:1: “God caused a wind to pass over the earth.”

With the loss of the canopy of water resulting in the Flood, this would have significantly reduced atmosphere pressure and increased equatorial temperatures, which would have ended the mist rising from the ground globally. The mist was the only means of watering the ground, upon its demise came evaporation to form into clouds, which subsequently would have led to rainfall and rainbows. This is the hydrological cycle as we know it today. With a canopy of water hovering around the atmosphere, this would have increased atmospheric pressure significantly enough that evaporation of water from the earth would not have formed clouds, but a mist rising from the earth to water the whole earth. Probably, when the cool of the day occurred, then the moisture in the air would rest on the soil as dew. With no clouds, then there was no rain prior to the Flood. Gen. 2:5–6 “For the Lord God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground. But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground.” Mist can also be translated to “flow.” However it is translated, the idea is the same. No hydrological cycle as we know it involving cloud formation and subsequent rain. That means no clouds and no rain before the Flood. With a mist rising from the ground to water the earth, there were no tornadoes, no hurricanes, no floods, no droughts, no lightning, and no hail. With the loss of the canopy of water and the subsequent reduction in atmospheric pressure, this allowed for cloud formation as the means for watering the ground, which subsequently led to hurricanes, tornadoes, hail, lightning, floods, droughts, and so forth. These weather events are a reminder of the curse of sin placed upon all creation.

With no clouds and no rain prior to the Flood, then there would have been no rainbows. This is why rainbows didn’t exist until after the Flood. Gen. 9 says that God set his rainbow in the sky as a covenant not to destroy life with flood waters again. With the loss of the canopy of water hovering around the atmosphere, this significantly reduced atmospheric pressure, allowing the formation of clouds and subsequently rain and light refraction from the raindrops to form rainbows in the sky.
The first mention of winter is not until after the Flood in Gen. 8:22.
The first mention of summer is not until after the Flood in Gen. 8:22.
The first mention of cold is not until after the Flood in Gen. 8:22.
The first mention of heat is not until after the Flood in Gen. 8:22.
Let that sink in for a moment. This is strong evidence that before the Flood, there were no winters, no summer, no cold, and no hot days of summer. In Gen. 1:14, when God finishes forming the sun, moon, and stars and says, “Let them be for signs and for seasons,” He uses the Hebrew word for seasons, which doesn’t mean spring, summer, fall, and winter. No—it means feasts and festivals and appointments of assembly.

Review: From the origins of life until after the Flood, there were no ice caps, no deserts, and no global jet stream, only mild breezes. The hydrological cycle bypassed clouds and rain and converted evaporation into a mist because of atmospheric pressure, and this is why there were no rainbows until after the Flood.

For the complete chapter and book, GET YOUR COPY TODAY!
Planets of the solar system with rings
[/expander_maker]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Proudly powered by WordPress