Skip to content

Creation Ministry provides the science and Scripture of the Genesis creation and global flood

  • Home
  • The Book
    • Preface
    • Gravity
    • The Effects of Weaker Gravity on Life
    • The Canopy of Salt Water
    • Climate
    • Oxygen Concentration
    • Land Was More Plentiful in the Past
    • Meteors, Asteroids, and Comets
    • Earth’s Spin at Origins
    • The Flood
    • No Deserts before the Flood
    • Seven-Day Creation Versus Seven-Eon Creation
  • Study Guides
    • Study Guide-Section 1 of 3
    • Study Guide-Section 2 of 3
    • Study Guide-Section 3 of 3
  • Recordings
    • What Happened to the Dinosaurs?
    • How Does Carbon 14 Dating Work?
    • Was there a Global Flood?
    • How old is the earth?
    • Transitional fossils, Truth or Fiction?
    • Were the Days of Creation literal or figurative?
    • Were the Days of Creation 24 hours?
    • How Did God Create Matter?
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence Appeared on Daniel Ott’s, The Edge
    • Dr. Walter Brown interviewed by Larry Wessels
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence interviewed by George Noory on Coast to Coast
    • Kent Hovind vs Michael Shermer
  • About
    • CreationMinistry.org
    • Dr. Troy Lawrence’s Biography
    • From Dr. Lawrence’s Desk
    • Statement of Faith
  • Creation Vs Evolution
    • Evolution Creation
      • Movie Review: First Man
      • Natural Selection
      • Were The Days Of Creation 24 Hours Long?
      • Does Isaiah 40:22 Say The Earth Is A Ball?
      • Was Genesis 7 A Global Flood Or A Local Flood?
      • How Dangerous is Evolution to Salvation?
      • The Lie of Evolution with the Sclera
      • What is the Age of a Spiral Galaxy?
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • Circular Reasoning of Deep Time
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Circular Reasoning
      • Homo naledi
      • Australopithecus boisei
      • Genetically identical twins – but not so identical traits
      • How millions of years changed to thousands
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • How to Debunk Evolution
      • Origin of the Laws and Constants in the Universe
      • Transitional Fossils
      • Seven things Darwin didn’t tell you
      • The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The End Product of Evolution by Bill Nye
      • The existing species concept called into question
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • There are no mechanisms for macroevolution
      • Trust in GOD
      • The spin of the Earth is slowing
      • Evolution Debunked
  • Contact

Monthly Support

Your monthly support is appreciated. All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.
Amount options

One Time Donation

Donate to Creation Ministry
All donations go to donating our books to others. Donations are tax deductible.




Bulk Purchase Discounts

Bulk Purchase Discount Bulk purchases discounts are available. Please contact us to inquire. Purchase the book

How to debunk the billions of years required by evolutionists.

Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to allegedly have enough time for creatures to change kinds (evolve). Thus, when their pseudo-evidence is debunked, then they are exposed as believing in error. One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They'll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn't exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water, then let it settle. 100% of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density. Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible's global Flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust, and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution. 2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that there are no meteorites found in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. Therefore, either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust came quickly from the global Flood of Genesis. The only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for evolution. 3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density. And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood. 4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There are observable evidences of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologist call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it's even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the Global flood and settled around the tree or fish. 5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bended from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represents that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers, and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood. And not cold over millions of years. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution's uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible's catastrophic global Flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence. This is a summary of a couple of pages in my book that is 420 pages. wpbeginner'/>
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/interbedding-grand-canyon.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/foldedlayers.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/14494791.jpg.crop_display.jpg
https://creationministry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/tennpoly-viss.jpg</div>
		</aside>			</div><!-- .widget-area -->
		
	</div><!-- .secondary -->

	</div><!-- .sidebar -->

	<div id=

The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms

The amazing diversity, beauty, and enigmatic genome of Diatoms

http://reasonandscience.heavenforum.org/t2466-the-amazing-diversity-beauty-and-enigmatic-genome-of-diatoms

Diatoms are one of the most important lifeforms on the planet. Plankton are responsible for 50% of earth’s oxygen. They have a very efficient way to dissipate excess solar energy, known as non-photochemical quenching. The real distinguishing feature of the diatoms is their shells. The valves are heavily embedded with silica (up to 71%). This glass-like wall reflects light creating intricate patterns that are striking and beautiful.

Chris Bowler from the Ecole Normale Supérieure at Paris thinks this clash of concepts just represents our anthropocentric and simplistic world view. “While we might want to call diatoms ‘plantimals,’ these things are much more complex than we think,” he says.

Diatoms have a sophisticated calcium and nitric oxide-based surveillance system for monitoring environmental stresses that can detect the release of aldehydes by its wounded neighbours. 18 Diatoms appear to have a highly mosaic genome, with genes originating from many different sources. Most notably, a large fraction of the genes may have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from bacteria. Although genomic data have shown that HGT — the swapping of genes between species that don’t reproduce with one another — is much more common in eukaryotes than once thought, gene transfer between such distant relatives (diatoms and bacteria last shared a common ancestor a few billion years ago) is rare.

Unless there was no common ancestor of the two.

Researchers at University of Gothenburg have found diatom spores buried in seafloor sediments that were able to revive after more than 100 years in a state of suspended animation.

Diatoms detect and respond to physicochemical changes in their environment using sophisticated perception systems.

At the end of a diatom bloom, massive cell loss usually occurs. In addition to sedimentation and grazing by herbivores, programmed cell death (PCD) of stressed cells is also considered one of the major causes for the decline of algal blooms. 8 The process of PCD executed by a superfamily of cysteine aspartate-specific proteinases (caspases) is a conserved mechanism of cell suicide.

Caspases are the principal proteases that are activated during animal apoptosis and mediate cleavage of a variety of proteins ultimately leading to cell disintegration 6 Caspases have undergone remarkable proliferation and specialization in vertebrates, in which they function in a cascade including several cleavage events. Structural comparisons showed that caspases belong to a distinct class of cysteine proteases, which also includes hemoglobinases, gingipains and clostripains (hereinafter CHF-class, after Caspase-Hemoglobinase Fold). Recent studies that involved a combination of in-depth sequence analysis, structural analysis and direct experiments revealed a substantially greater diversity of caspase-related proteases than previously suspected. In particular, two families of predicted CHF-proteases that are more closely related to the classic caspases than to other proteases of this class, designated paracaspases and metacaspases, were identified

If Darwins survival of the fittest is the goal of evolution, cell suicide is counter-intuitive, and it would make no sense for cells to emerge with proteins specifically with the function to trigger suicide.
If caspases are evolutionarily conserved, it means there was no evolution, but stasis. Conservation is not evolution. its actually the oposit of evolution. Its common parlance that evoution is inserted even where it does not belong. Caspases have to emerge fully setup and functional. (Undoubtedly, similar mechanisms go back even further; scientists just happened to study this mechanism in a favorite lab worm, C. elegans.) There are at least seven genes involved in apoptosis. Failure of apoptotis has serious consequences for inflammation and autoimmunity.

By Otangelo Grasso

Posted on April 7, 2017Author Otangelo GrassoTags Diatoms

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Homo naledi
Next Next post: How millions of years changed to thousands
Proudly powered by WordPress