Australopithecus boisei

Australopithecus

“Australopithecus boisei: OH 5 (530 cc) and KNM-ER 406 (510 cc):
All life was once larger and had to adapt to environmental changes resulting from the Flood. Those changes were a 50% reduction in O2 concentration, and a loss of the canopy that resulted in reduced buoyant force, which resulted in an increased net gravitational force. The empirical data that life was once larger is in the entire fossil record, and can be read in the Bible that there were once giants on the Earth.Australopithecus
Look at the image, notice the similar distinguishing features of Astralopithecus and a male chimpanzee’s skull (~450 cc). Specifically the prominent sagital crest, minimal frontal bone, deep brow ridge sulcus, pronounced temporal crest, protruding zygomatic arch, and prominent brow ridge. The entire fossil record illustrates adaptation (changes within their kind, called micro-evolution) and refutes evolution (changes to a different kind, called macro-evolution or Darwinian evolution).”

 

Quote from Origins, The Origin of Matter, Space, Time, and Life, page 197.

 

Bottom line, we did not evolve from a smaller primate. Instead, the Australopethicus adapted to changes in the environment and became smaller to the male chimp. Evolutionists are notorious for merely placing skulls according to their ideology of smaller to larger, but the entire fossil record is of life that was once larger and became smaller over time. Completely opposite of the lie of evolution. And this fulfills 2 Timothy 4:3-4 that in the latter days mankind will accumulate teachers to teach a myth. All of academia teaches the myth of evolution.

Transitional Fossils

Quote from Origins, The Origin of Matter, Space, Time, and Life. Chapter 22, Transitional Fossils, pg 188.

Transitional Fossils

“Within the layers of the crust, there are trillions of fossils. They are not rare at all. What is rare and does not exist is a transitional fossil demonstrating a change of kind. Every dead fossil shows that something died, not something that passed on genetic information. Evolutionists say they believe in evolution because of the preponderance of evidence in the fossils. But the fossil record does not support evolution at all; it merely records that something died and was quickly covered up in a brief moment in time and not over millions of years. What does support evolution are the interpretations of the fossils and the clay models that are created to represent what the archeologist’s imagines their find looked like, once upon a time. However, any bone fossil found in the dirt only tells us that a creature died, and it is speculation to suggest that any of their genetic information was passed on, so fossils do not tell us that the specimen had offspring. Photo credit: www.livescience.com.
What about some of those pesky so-called evolutionary missing link discoveries that supposedly prove evolution and debunk creation? They do not exist. They are either falsified findings, or misinterpretations of the evidence, or wrong conclusions because of a lack of knowledge.
When an evolutionist, atheist or theist, show you a skull of an alleged transitional fossil, ask them the gender of the skull, the age of when the decedent died, what strata was the fossil found in, and what percentage of the skull is fabricated to fit the evolutionary ideology? Why are these questions important?
Well, when a creature is growing, there are differences in the cranial volume, skull size, and distinguishing features at varying ages of development. Keep in mind that though the human body stops growing vertically at a certain age, the facial bones never stop developing. As we age, the jaw protrudes, the eye brow ridges protrude, and so forth. We are able to see these developmental differences from a 20 year old face from a 70 year old face. How much more of a difference do you suppose we could visualize from someone living 900+ years, as in prior to the Flood. And for this reason, knowing that the decedent was an adult is not sufficient, one must know the age of the decedent. Photo credit: www.clinicalgate.com.Transitional FossilsScience of creation
The other critical bit of information is the gender. There are variations of the overall size, cranial volume, and external features of the skull between the genders as well. Males have a larger skull, larger cranial volume, and more muscle attachments, which results in larger protuberances for those origin and insertion locations. Look carefully at the image of three primates, and notice the differences between the male and female. The Science of creation
It is also important to know what strata the fossil was found in because according to evolutionary doctrine, the strata was deposited in lock-step with evolution. Thus, if an evolutionist won’t tell you the strata the skull was found in, or no one knows, then it is dubious to place a skull according to philosophical order. And lastly, it is vital to know what percentage of the skull was fabricated by an artist. If one adds putty to suit their preconceived philosophical views, and the public is unaware that the artists started with only a tooth, or a clavicle, or a jaw bone, and so forth, that is deceitful. Image credit: www.theistic-evolution.com
Indoctrination of evolutionary preaching
Review: Placing skull fossils in philosophical order to suit one’s own preconceived ideology, without knowing the gender, age of the decedent, the strata the skull was found, and the percentage of artistic liberty taken by the artist is reckless. When an evolutionist shows you skull fossils placed in philosophical order to preach evolution, now you know why to question the age of the decedent, the gender, the strata depth, and the percentage of artist’s putty.”

Circular Reasoning

Have you ever been accused of Circular Reasoning by an evolutionists? Don’t be alarmed when evolutionists say that Christians use circular reasoning. For example, “Believers claim the Bible is true because the Bible says it’s true, and the Bible is the Word of God because the Bible tells us so.” I have been persecuted by evolutionists many times with this debater’s tactic, and the following picture is what they will use:
Circular Reasoning
This is just a debate tactic to say that Christians don’t use science and physics and logic. Though the Bible claims to be truth, anyone can study the Bible and find out what it claimed would happen and what has happened. After careful study, we find indeed that the Bible authenticates itself with fulfilled prophecies and accuracy in regard to doctrine, geography, archeology, biology, and all the sciences.

Evolutionists are guilty of the very same thing that they accuse Christians of. They proclaim that one can determine how old a bone is by what level in the soil that the bone came from, and one can determine how old the soil is by what bone comes from that level in the soil. “The rocks do [sic] date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately.”1 That statement is circular reasoning and not science, but that is one technique evolutionists will employ. They will accuse Christians of the very thing they are committing—circular reasoning. And this dogmatic belief is so strong that the name geological column is often called the geological time scale.
Circular Reasoning, The Science and Scripture of the Genesis creation and global flood

How to Debunk Evolution

Learn how to debunk evolution by addressing the notion of hundreds-of-millions-of-years in the layers of the crust.

Dr. Lawrence has some powerful insight to the conditions for life “In the beginning.” And that is that gravity was weaker and the oxygen concentration was higher because there was a canopy of water that once hovered around our atmosphere. Water, especially the location of water, was the critical element that caused life to thrive before the global flood (Genesis 7-9). His book, “Origins: The Origin of Matter, Space, Time, and Life,” elucidates this hypothesis that is supported by science and the Scriptures. The following is a general summary of a couple of pages in his book:
Evolution requires hundreds of millions of years to have enough time for creatures to allegedly change kinds (evolve). Thus, when evolutionists’ pseudo-science is debunked it is clear that their belief is wrong.interbedding-grand-canyon
One bit of pseudo-evidence they routinely cite is the many layers of the crust. They’ll explain that the layers deposited over 100,000 to a million years for each layer. And for this reason, the many layers represent hundreds of millions of years.
This is wrong for several reasons:
1. When soil is deposited by the slow natural uniformitarian process, it doesn’t exclusively deposit only sand for 100,000 years, then limestone for the next million years, then mud with biomass for a million years, then mud without biomass for a million years, and so forth. No, all the soil sediment is mixed together. But when we look at the crust of the earth, the soil is in layers and segregated. This proves that the soil was once mixed together in a global flood, and then as the soil settled, it settled according to density and formed layers. We can test this by mixing soil in water and then letting it settle. One hundred percent of the time the soil will settle in layers based on its density. And there were two agents that broke up the static friction to assist the segregation process of the sediment, which were the earthquakes and the ocean tide that swept across the globe unimpeded, twice daily. Those two forces caused liquefaction that further segregated the sediment. Therefore, the layers of the crust is proof positive that the soil came quickly, was mixed together in a global flood, and then settled according to density.
Based on the scientific method, we are able to observe that the Bible’s global flood matches perfectly with the empirical data of the soil in the crust and that the slow deposit hypothesis that evolutionists use (uniformitarian) is incongruous with the observable evidence. Furthermore, we can test that soil settles in water in layers, just as the Biblical Flood caused, and each test testifies against the old age belief required to support evolution.foldedlayers

2. Meteorites usually get burned up in the atmosphere. However, roughly ~50,000 meteorites hit Earth each year. But did you know that meteorites are lacking in the lower layers of the crust. If evolutionary geologists are correct, and each layer is estimated to be 100,000 to a million years old, then there should be ~5 billion meteorites per layer. But since they are lacking, then either no meteorites hit the earth for 100s of millions of years, or the layers of the crust formed quickly from the global flood of Genesis. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the soil came quickly, and for this reason alone, there is not enough time for macro-evolution.

3. There are no erosion marks between each layer. The layers are uniformly deposited without the usual erosion marks that comes from rain. Thus, either there was no rain on the earth while each layer was slowly being deposited over millions of years, or the layers came quickly from the catastrophic Flood of Genesis and the soil settled in layers according to their density.
And for this reason, the soil was deposited quickly to account for no erosion marks from rain. That is, the Genesis catastrophic Flood.tennpoly-viss

4. Polystrata petrification and fossilization. There is observable evidence of petrified trees that transcend what evolutionary geologists call millions of years. No tree will wait around for the layers to slowly accumulate. Once the first layer comes, the tree will die and decay to dust before the second layer could finish. Thus, each petrified tree transcending through multiple layers represents that the soil came quickly, not over millions of years. And it’s even worse considering the fragile marine life found transcending through multiple layers. This is proof positive that the layers came quickly from the global flood and settled around the tree or fish.

5. We observe looking at the crust that there are examples of many layers that have bent from tectonic plates colliding. However, the bends in the layers represent that the soil was hot, malleable, and not hard as seen today. This evidence stands against the slow deposit belief because of the lack of cracks in the layers and the visible bending of the layers. This supports the notion that the layers came quickly and settled while being warm from the catastrophic global flood14494791.jpg.crop_display and not cold over millions of years.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the slow deposit hypothesis of evolution’s Uniformitarian theory is completely in error, and the Bible’s catastrophic global flood is in perfect harmony with science and best explains the observable evidence.

This is only a general summary of one chapter in his book.